Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Home » Legal News » Pennsylvania Corporation Guilty of Bid Rigging at Tax Lien Auctions in New Jersey

Pennsylvania Corporation Guilty of Bid Rigging at Tax Lien Auctions in New Jersey

September 27, 2012 02:05pm  
Pennsylvania Corporation Guilty of Bid Rigging at Tax Lien Auctions in New Jersey

 

On September 26, 2012, the Department of Justice announced that Crusader Servicing Corp. in Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, pleaded guilty to rigging bids for municipal tax liens in New Jersey by making sure certain bidders would bid on specific liens.  The rigging is believed to have occurred between 1998 and 2006. 

Scott Hammond, the Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the criminal enforcement program under the Antitrust Division, explained, “The conspirators agreed to not compete with one another at these tax liens auctions, depriving struggling homeowners of a competitive interest rate.” 

Tax lien auctions work in the following way.  If the owner of a property fails to pay taxes on the property, the municipality will, in some cases, place a lien for the total amount of unpaid tax.  The property owner has a waiting period, but if they still fail to make a payment, the lien is then sold at an auction.  Law requires the bidding for investors to start at 18 percent interest, and after competition, the interest rate may be reduced to zero percent.  The delinquent homeowner then pays the unpaid taxes with the new interest rate attached.  If the taxes still remain unpaid, the investor can start foreclosure proceedings. 

Because certain investors like Crusader agreed not to bid against each other, the highest interest rate was obtained.  The Department of Justice announced that Crusader’s guilty plea was the 10th such plea in an ongoing investigation.  The following people and companies have pleaded guilty so far: Isadore H. May, Richard J. Pisciotta Jr., William A Collins, Robert W. Stein, David M. Farber, Robert E. Rothman, Stephen E. Hruby, David Butler, and DSBD LLC. 

This crime violates the Sherman Act and has a maximum penalty of a $100 million criminal fine. 

Source: Department of Justice

Comments

Must Read

 Mail Fraud Quick Overview Mail Fraud Quick Overview
Mail fraud refers to any deceitful crime that includes the use of the postal system.
Accountant Fraud At A Glance Accountant Fraud At A Glance
Accountant fraud (or corporate accounting scandals) often occurs as a result of an accountant not disclosing factual statements to their clients (individuals or businesses) about the state of their finances.
All You Need To Know About Mail Fraud Charges All You Need To Know About Mail Fraud Charges
Mail fraud charges are used most frequently in federal white collar crime cases to either make an initial charge or add a charge to a list of existing ones.
All You Need To Know About Reporting Blindness All You Need To Know About Reporting Blindness
One of the most common disability fraud types  Disability fraud falling into the category of "reporting blindness" can also include criminals taking advantage of acts intended to help the legally blind return to work.
All You Need to Know About Supreme Court Cases All You Need to Know About Supreme Court Cases
There are two cases that involve the proper criminal procedure involving the prosecution of wire fraud.
All You Need to Know About The History Identity Theft All You Need to Know About The History Identity Theft
Identity theft, though it has taken on new forms and has become significantly more common, is not a new crime.
Bait and Switch Definition Bait and Switch Definition
It may not necessarily be all that obvious all the time, but the bait and switch tactic used by both the retail and political world should be of no surprise to people living in nations which are fueled by consumerism and politics.
Bankruptcy Fraud At A Glance Bankruptcy Fraud At A Glance
Bankruptcy fraud is any kind of fraud involving filing for bankruptcy in an attempt to gain some kind of profit from the overall scheme.
Tips